June 17, 2019

Start of the Oyster Restoration Season

by S-FX.com

patent tongs oyster

Article by Christine Thompson, Assistant Professor of Marine Science, Stockton University.

A foggy day in late May brought my team of staff and students from Stockton University to sample oysters on our research lease in southern Barnegat Bay (which we call the“Tuckerton Reef”). This is part of routine sampling we do on the reef each spring. A second grant from the Barnegat Bay Partnership gives this project new life — after three years of planting shell on the reef, this summer we will go from one to two acres and more than double the amount of shell that was placed on this reef since the beginning of this project. (Read more about the initial project here.)

Oysters were planted on this site in 2016 and 2017. They were first reared in tanks where larvae were placed onto clean whelk or oyster shell and after a few weeks were brought to the restoration reef in Barnegat Bay. We also transplanted some oyster seed from a site in the Mullica River. After almost three years, the oysters are still going strong.

Oyster from the Tuckerton Reef
A three year old oyster (Crassostrea virgnica) from the reef samples.

Benchmarks for successful oyster reefs have suggested there needs to be at least 15 oysters per square meter to have a functional oyster reef — our samples averaged 27 oysters per square meter. The average size of these oysters is over 4 inches — this means that each oyster can filter more than 50 gallons of water a day, which is over one-thousand gallons per square meter! This volume of water is equivalent to running a garden hose for one hour.

Although we have been monitoring this reef for almost three years, this year we are trying to implement some new methods for sampling them. Patent tongs are like giant (and very heavy) forks we carefully deploy off the side of the boat. When they reach the bottom, they close, and should capture everything within a square meter of reef bottom. The tongs were pretty good at sampling the oysters that were growing on the whelk shell substrate, but they were less successful at pulling up the shell that was transplanted from the Mullica River. We are going to be doing some sonar work to look for this shell using sound waves on the bottom and figure out the best way to sample it.

The two main goals of this project are to document habitat creation and quantify the water filtration capability of the oysters on the reef. Throughout the summer we will be performing studies to assess fish and invertebrate use of the reef and collect more long-term water quality data so we can better understand the impacts these oysters are having on water filtration and nutrient removal.

Sample collected from Tuckerton Oyster Reef
Sample from one square meter of reef bottom showing oysters that were reared on whelk shell substrate planted in 2016.

As a biologist, I am most interested in the community of organisms that live around the oysters. This includes things like fish, crabs, and snails that live amongst the shells, and organisms that live on the surface of shells like sea squirts, sponges, and tiny moss animals called bryozoans. Each time we sample we find something new in our samples—like bay scallops, sea horses, or sea slugs. This time we found the coolest surprise so far—a hairy sea cucumber!

Hairy sea cucmber from the Tuckerton Reef
This hairy sea cucumber, Sclerodactyla briareus, is an echinoderm and related to sea stars and sea urchins.

Without the oysters creating three-dimensional habitat, these organisms would be vulnerable to predators on the seafloor. Seeing the numbers of species increase each time we sample is proof of this habitat creation.

Stay tuned throughout the summer as I post updates on the different pieces of this project. In late June, we will do a live video cast from the site as we pull up samples and talk about the different species we find.

Special thanks to our partners in this project, Parsons Mariculture, Long Beach Township, and JettyRock Foundation which provide the oysters and shell for the reef. Learn more about the local shell recycling program here.

Author contact: Christine.Thompson@stockton.edu

Explore More Insights from Barnegat Bay

Dive deeper into the ongoing efforts to protect and restore our environment with more updates and initiatives that you can take part in. Check out our latest blog posts for valuable tips and insights.

UNKNOWN

There is limited data available to quantify Wetland and Riparian Buffer Preservation, or updated data to quantify Wetland Acreage. The BBP has obtained funding and will begin assessment efforts for both targets, in the next few years.

 

 Hard Clam abundance has not been updated since 2012. Recovery of the stock will be guided by the Fishery Management Plan for Hard Clams, which is under development with the NJDEP, BBP, and other organizations. Reclam the Bay and other partners have continued to plant clams for restoration purposes. Continued plantings in strategic locations which maximize survival and reproduction is one strategy to pursue in the coming years. This work can use a model developed by Rutgers with BBP funding which identified areas where planted clams could have the greatest dispersal of their larvae and thus potentially maximally contribute to the recovery of the stock.

 Water Withdrawals were over the target in the 2021 report; USGS has not yet completed its latest update, so a definitive determination of status is not available. However, additional NJDEP data show that it is likely that we continue to not meet the target. Per capita water use has gone down, demonstrating the effectiveness of water-saving appliances and practices, but that decrease has been offset by population gains. 


IN PROGRESS

New maps quantifying Submerged Aquatic Vegetation extent were developed, but poor image clarity resulted in a high degree of uncertainty in the total acreage. NJDEP and Rutgers are working to resolve the uncertainty of these maps, and improve the total acreage estimate. Funding has also been obtained for further research and restoration activities. Several groups are developing potential restoration actions.

The USGS has completed the first phase of its study to identify minimum ecological flows in select Barnegat Bay tributaries. USGS scientists compared streamflow statistics between historical and current time periods to better understand trends in watershed flow conditions. This work provides a foundation for developing ecological flow targets in the Barnegat Bay watershed.  Similar to SAV extent, funding (approximately $450K) has been obtained by the BBP to complete the remaining phases necessary for threshold determination.

 

TARGETS ACHIEVED

No targets can be considered “Achieved” at this time.

 

NOT ACHIEVING

Several Public Swimming Beaches exceeded their safe swimming standards more frequently than during their baseline time period (2016-2018).

While most beaches are routinely safe for swimming, several problematic areas such as Beachwood, Hancock, Windward, and several lake beaches need track-down studies and restoration to pinpoint and address sources of bacteria.

Acres of Approved Shellfish Waters decreased from the last report. While this decrease was small, it represents a loss of previously approved waters. Similar to public beaches, track-down studies and restoration work are needed to pinpoint and address sources of bacteria.

 

Start of the Oyster Restoration Season

Article by Christine Thompson, Assistant Professor of Marine Science, Stockton University.

A foggy day in late May brought my team of staff and students from Stockton University to sample oysters on our research lease in southern Barnegat Bay (which we call the“Tuckerton Reef”). This is part of routine sampling we do on the reef each spring. A second grant from the Barnegat Bay Partnership gives this project new life — after three years of planting shell on the reef, this summer we will go from one to two acres and more than double the amount of shell that was placed on this reef since the beginning of this project. (Read more about the initial project here.)

Oysters were planted on this site in 2016 and 2017. They were first reared in tanks where larvae were placed onto clean whelk or oyster shell and after a few weeks were brought to the restoration reef in Barnegat Bay. We also transplanted some oyster seed from a site in the Mullica River. After almost three years, the oysters are still going strong.

Oyster from the Tuckerton Reef
A three year old oyster (Crassostrea virgnica) from the reef samples.

Benchmarks for successful oyster reefs have suggested there needs to be at least 15 oysters per square meter to have a functional oyster reef — our samples averaged 27 oysters per square meter. The average size of these oysters is over 4 inches — this means that each oyster can filter more than 50 gallons of water a day, which is over one-thousand gallons per square meter! This volume of water is equivalent to running a garden hose for one hour.

Although we have been monitoring this reef for almost three years, this year we are trying to implement some new methods for sampling them. Patent tongs are like giant (and very heavy) forks we carefully deploy off the side of the boat. When they reach the bottom, they close, and should capture everything within a square meter of reef bottom. The tongs were pretty good at sampling the oysters that were growing on the whelk shell substrate, but they were less successful at pulling up the shell that was transplanted from the Mullica River. We are going to be doing some sonar work to look for this shell using sound waves on the bottom and figure out the best way to sample it.

The two main goals of this project are to document habitat creation and quantify the water filtration capability of the oysters on the reef. Throughout the summer we will be performing studies to assess fish and invertebrate use of the reef and collect more long-term water quality data so we can better understand the impacts these oysters are having on water filtration and nutrient removal.

Sample collected from Tuckerton Oyster Reef
Sample from one square meter of reef bottom showing oysters that were reared on whelk shell substrate planted in 2016.

As a biologist, I am most interested in the community of organisms that live around the oysters. This includes things like fish, crabs, and snails that live amongst the shells, and organisms that live on the surface of shells like sea squirts, sponges, and tiny moss animals called bryozoans. Each time we sample we find something new in our samples—like bay scallops, sea horses, or sea slugs. This time we found the coolest surprise so far—a hairy sea cucumber!

Hairy sea cucmber from the Tuckerton Reef
This hairy sea cucumber, Sclerodactyla briareus, is an echinoderm and related to sea stars and sea urchins.

Without the oysters creating three-dimensional habitat, these organisms would be vulnerable to predators on the seafloor. Seeing the numbers of species increase each time we sample is proof of this habitat creation.

Stay tuned throughout the summer as I post updates on the different pieces of this project. In late June, we will do a live video cast from the site as we pull up samples and talk about the different species we find.

Special thanks to our partners in this project, Parsons Mariculture, Long Beach Township, and JettyRock Foundation which provide the oysters and shell for the reef. Learn more about the local shell recycling program here.

Author contact: Christine.Thompson@stockton.edu

Contact Start of the Oyster Restoration SeasonContact Start of the Oyster Restoration Season
patent tongs oyster