Watershed Restoration Plans


The Barnegat Bay watershed spans 600 square miles including Ocean and Monmouth Counties, and is home to over 500,000 New Jersians. Within this region are twelve sub-watersheds; smaller, more localized areas defined by land that drains into specific rivers. These include the Metedeconk, Toms River, Forked River, Cedar Creek, Mill Creek, Westecunk Creek, Tuckerton Creek, and more.

The headwaters, or where the rivers begin, of these sub watersheds are critical to supporting the infrastructure of the people living in the region. For example, much of the drinking water in the north part of Ocean County comes from the headwaters from the Metedeconk River. To ensure these natural resources remain healthy and viable, the NJDEP along with the Barnegat Bay Partnership and various other partners have developed, and continue to develop, Watershed Restoration Plans.
marsh p4e paddle for the edge

Protection and Restoration

Each of these subwatersheds has a unique mix of land-use types, ranging from undeveloped (forests, marshes, grasslands, and wetlands) to lightly developed (agricultural lands and rural communities) to more highly developed (suburban/urban neighborhoods and commercial and industrial areas). These different land-use types affect the quality and quantity of the water flowing through and under them in different ways, and ultimately affect the quality of life for the people and wildlife that call this area home.
To improve conditions in the bay and its watershed, the Barnegat Bay Partnership is developing two new Watershed Protection and Restoration Plans, one for the Toms River subwatershed and one for the Cedar Creek/Forked River/Oyster Creek subwatershed complex.
bbvmn master naturalistbridgemantoloking Small sailboat at yacht clubjfy jersey friendly yards
islandpaddle for the edge p4eiowa court dronebeach

Identifying Problems and Collecting Information

Members of each Stakeholder Advisory Group discuss what is known about water quality/quantity issues in the subwatershed and identify the priorities and objectives the plan should address. Some areas have known problems (e.g., harmful bacteria, low oxygen levels, too much sediment in the water, not as much/too much flow at times, flooding) but the causes may not always be immediately clear.
In an effort to gather more information, project scientists are collecting and analyzing water samples at key points along the rivers and streams within the subwatershed. They are also conducting visual assessments of stream segments. Walking along the stream, they note the physical characteristics and look for evidence of erosion, poor water quality (like excess algae), stormwater and sanitary sewer infrastructure, and other evidence of sources of pollution. The information gathered in the field will be combined with other sources of information (previous studies, other water quality sampling, land use maps, etc.) to document the subwatershed’s current status and expected trends, and to identify areas of concern.
BBP staff collecting data during a visual stream assessment

BBP staff collecting data during a visual stream assessment.

Developing the Plan

The next step is to come up with different ways to tackle the problems identified during the technical analyses. Some of the recommendations may be “structural” (e.g., fix a detention basin, create a treatment wetland, install vegetated swales in a parking lot), while others may be “non-structural” (e.g., purchase land for open space preservation, recommend changes to local ordinances, conduct an education campaign about water use).
The project team will work with the Stakeholder Advisory Group to develop strategies. Together they will prioritize strategies based on local knowledge and their ability to meet the agreed-upon objectives. With field data collection, technical analyses, and strategy prioritization complete, the project team will pull it all together to create the Watershed Protection and Restoration Plan.

Taking Action

The next step is to work on improving water quality in the subwatershed by putting the new plan into action. Up to five conceptual designs will be prepared for each subwatershed, and working in conjunction with the Stakeholder Advisory Group, one project in each subwatershed will move forward into planning and construction. Other projects identified in the plan will be implemented once additional funding becomes available. Besides having a suite of strategies for improving water quality at the ready, having an approved plan also makes potential projects eligible for dedicated funding streams that would otherwise be unavailable.

Plans for the Entire Watershed

These two Watershed Protection and Restoration Plans, and a third plan being prepared by a team led by Rutgers University for the Mill Creek and other southern watershed streams, are being funded by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection through the 2018 Water Quality Restoration Grant Program. When completed and combined with the Metedeconk River Watershed Protection and Restoration Plan previously prepared by the Brick Township Municipal Utilities Authority, there will be approved plans for the entire Barnegat Bay watershed — great news for protecting and restoring the bay for generations to come.

Stakeholder Advisory Committee

The first step in developing a new plan is to form a Stakeholder Advisory Committee. Input from stakeholders at the community, municipal, county, and state level is critically important to ensure the plans benefit every municipality, as well as the region as a whole, both environmentally and economically. A Stakeholder Advisory Committee has been established for the Toms River plan and a separate one for the Cedar Creek/Forked River/Oyster Creek plan. Contact Ceili Pestalozzi, BBP Watershed Specialist, about joining one (or both) of these committees.

UNKNOWN

There is limited data available to quantify Wetland and Riparian Buffer Preservation, or updated data to quantify Wetland Acreage. The BBP has obtained funding and will begin assessment efforts for both targets, in the next few years.

 

 Hard Clam abundance has not been updated since 2012. Recovery of the stock will be guided by the Fishery Management Plan for Hard Clams, which is under development with the NJDEP, BBP, and other organizations. Reclam the Bay and other partners have continued to plant clams for restoration purposes. Continued plantings in strategic locations which maximize survival and reproduction is one strategy to pursue in the coming years. This work can use a model developed by Rutgers with BBP funding which identified areas where planted clams could have the greatest dispersal of their larvae and thus potentially maximally contribute to the recovery of the stock.

 Water Withdrawals were over the target in the 2021 report; USGS has not yet completed its latest update, so a definitive determination of status is not available. However, additional NJDEP data show that it is likely that we continue to not meet the target. Per capita water use has gone down, demonstrating the effectiveness of water-saving appliances and practices, but that decrease has been offset by population gains. 


IN PROGRESS

New maps quantifying Submerged Aquatic Vegetation extent were developed, but poor image clarity resulted in a high degree of uncertainty in the total acreage. NJDEP and Rutgers are working to resolve the uncertainty of these maps, and improve the total acreage estimate. Funding has also been obtained for further research and restoration activities. Several groups are developing potential restoration actions.

The USGS has completed the first phase of its study to identify minimum ecological flows in select Barnegat Bay tributaries. USGS scientists compared streamflow statistics between historical and current time periods to better understand trends in watershed flow conditions. This work provides a foundation for developing ecological flow targets in the Barnegat Bay watershed.  Similar to SAV extent, funding (approximately $450K) has been obtained by the BBP to complete the remaining phases necessary for threshold determination.

 

TARGETS ACHIEVED

No targets can be considered “Achieved” at this time.

 

NOT ACHIEVING

Several Public Swimming Beaches exceeded their safe swimming standards more frequently than during their baseline time period (2016-2018).

While most beaches are routinely safe for swimming, several problematic areas such as Beachwood, Hancock, Windward, and several lake beaches need track-down studies and restoration to pinpoint and address sources of bacteria.

Acres of Approved Shellfish Waters decreased from the last report. While this decrease was small, it represents a loss of previously approved waters. Similar to public beaches, track-down studies and restoration work are needed to pinpoint and address sources of bacteria.

 

Watershed Restoration

The more than 600 square miles of land draining to the bay can be divided into subwatersheds associated with the major waterways flowing to the bay – the Metedeconk River, Toms River, Cedar Creek/Forked River/Oyster Creek complex, and Mill Creek and the southern streams.

Contact Watershed RestorationContact Watershed Restoration
Tributary of the Toms River